Author(s):

ECHR Ruling: 

"sharia law is incompatible with democracy and human rights"

Source: 

Annual Report 2003 of the European Court of Human Rights

Council of Europe

Author(s):

Summary: 

The voice of tyranny is often represented as the thunderous pounding of a gauntleted fist on the door in the dark reaches of the night. In fact, in my short time as Chair of Index on Censorship, I have learned that, more frequently, people who try to tell the truth under authoritarian regimes first detect the true voice of oppression in the quiet, dry-as-dust whisper of the bureaucrat’s pen as it scratches out some apparently innocuous message. Then you read it and it says: recant, and repent now. Confess, grovel, beg, denounce your fellow deviants, and you may save your livelihood, your home, your permit to travel. Do as we say, accept the mortification of the flesh, and your soul may, just, escape eternal damnation.

 

by on Scribd

Summary: 

Sharia Watch: Pedictably, this document makes NO reference to the fact that these punishments are mandated in the Quran and therefore in sharia law.

Although most modern societies do not consider amputation as a correctional method, many third-world nations have adopted punitive amputations. Judicial amputation is still used in Iran, Yemen, Sudan, Afghanistan, and the Islamic regions of Nigeria. In July 2009, Al Shabaab of Somalia, and the Islamic Sharia (strict Islamic law) court sentenced four teenagers to amputation of their right foot and left hand as punishment for stealing mobile phones and other goods . The Deputy Chief Justice of Sudan recently revealed that 16 people were subjected to amputations since 2001 . Adam al-Muthna, 30, was the first reported case of forced amputation in Sudan. Three doctors amputated the right hand and left foot of al-Muthna on February 14, 2013 in a hospital in Khartoum. This event attracted a public outcry, particularly by the Sudanese Doctors’ Union. The union complained that the doctors were horrified to break the Hippocratic Oath by harming their patient instead of protecting him .

The common judicial punishment for theft in Saudi Arabia is the amputation of the right hand . But for highway robbery, the punishment is cross amputation —amputation of the right hand and left foot. Although such cases have been unusual in Saudi Arabia, Amnesty International reported four cases in 1986. In 1990, fewer than ten hand amputations reportedly occurred, at least five of which were administered to foreigners . More recently, a court in Saudi Arabia sentenced six men to cross amputations for highway robbery. In October 2011, a court of appeal upheld this cross amputation sentence .

Summary: 

Professors at U.S. colleges and universities teach some world history and a lot of mythology. Those who speak of a war against terrorism rather than a war against radical Islam put forward a myth of multicultural harmony in medieval Spain among Muslim overlords and Christian or Jewish subjects. Not so, asserts author Darío Fernández-Morera, who shows how Muslims ran a dhimmi system that was a gangster-like protection racket. Christians and Jews had to pay up and accept second-class citizenship. If they rebelled, Muslims could cut off their heads or make their children sexual slaves.

This book aims to demystify Islamic Spain by questioning the widespread belief that it was a wonderful place of tolerance and convivencia of three cultures under the benevolent supervision of enlightened Muslim rulers. As the epigraphs throughout this book illustrate, the nineteenth-century romantic vision of Islamic Spain has morphed into today’s “mainstream” academic and popular writings that celebrate “al-Andalus” for its “multiculturalism,” “unity of Muslims, Christians, and Jews,” “diversity,” and “pluralism,” regardless of how close such emphasis is to the facts. Some scholars of the Spanish Middle Ages have even openly declared an interest in promoting these ideas.

Under the Islamic institution of the dhimma (writ or contract of “protection”), the Christian dhimmis of al-Andalus must pay a special tax, the jizya, for a “protection” intended, as Maliki legal texts make clear, to remind them of their submission. Malik’s Muwatta declares, “Zakat is imposed on the Muslims to purify them and to be given back to their poor, whereas jizya is imposed on the people of the Book to humble them.”10 Therefore the jizya ought to be paid in a humiliating manner:

The dhimmi, standing, would present the money to the Muslim collector who would be sitting higher up on a sort of throne; this Muslim bureaucrat would hold the dhimmi by the throat telling him “Oh dhimmi, enemy of Allah, pay the jizya that you owe us for the protection and tolerance we grant you”; the other Muslims present would imitate the collector, pushing around the dhimmi and whoever other dhimmis accompanied him. To this amusing spectacle should be admitted any Muslim who wanted to enjoy it.11

As part of the dhimma system, a Muslim “officer of protection” regulated all affairs related to Christians.

Author(s):

A useful self-defence guide to those facing charges of Islamophobia.

First ask the accusers/investigators if they agree with this European Court of Human Rights judgment summary:

ECHR:

Author(s):

Summary: 

Note:- This article has no direct connection to Islamic sharia law but the curtailment of free speech in academia reflects the suppression freedom of thought and speech under sharia via the apostasy and blasphemy laws.

In 2015, discerning that  was under assault in American universities, Chicago reaffirmed its ‘commitment to free, robust, and uninhibited debate and deliberation among all members of the university’s community’. The subsequent statement of policy – the so-called  – is at once stirring and precise; it has been rightly praised as a full-throated (and much needed) defence of campus free expression. In addition to publishing the Chicago Principles, the University has repeatedly and unequivocally promulgated its commitment to free speech on its  and in  by its president, provost, and deans.

Alas, however, although the University of Chicago is a unique institution of higher education, it nonetheless inhabits the ecosystem of higher education.

Summary: 

Author(s):

Summary: 

  • the original unabridged and fully-referenced version with minor updates;
  • a new short (~two hours reading) version with 118 colour pictures by Connor O'Grady; and
  • the short version without pictures, for those who dislike pictures.

Free PDF copies are available from  and on .  Please download them, post them anywhere and everywhere, and share them with anyone who might be interested.


Kindle and paperback copies can be purchased from , which is the best place to leave a review if you’d like to write one.


The audiobook is available from , or through  or  on your computer or favourite device via their free apps.


I cannot recommend  highly enough. Get your copy today. 


Kind regards, 


Peter

 

Country: 
France
News Date: 
27/02/2020
Summary: 

Witless Western feminists now have an annual event, World Hijab Day, in which they don hijabs in order to show solidarity with Muslim women in the West who supposedly experience abuse for wearing the hijab, although a great many of these incidents have been found to have been faked by the alleged victims. The real victims of abuse over wearing the hijab are much more often girls and women who don’t wear it, such as Youness Moussaid’s stepdaughter.

Country: 
Egypt
News Date: 
27/02/2020
Summary: 

 

#“But nothing about being a Christian is easy in Egypt.”

Pages

Subscribe to Front page feed