You are here

Values

Summary:


The FCO [UK Govt. Foreign and Commonwealth Office] defined the concept of Islamism as promoting :

“the application of Islamic values to modern government and society”

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmfaff/118/118.pdf
http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/foreign-affairs-committee/political-islam/written/33360.html

Giles Fraser: On the difficulties of moral decision making in practice.

Rose had a lot to say about how ethics in the 20th century had detached itself from the practical business of governance. She blamed this development on a reaction amongst professional ethicists to the violence of the early part of the century, a reaction that led many to adopt an extreme reluctance to formulate any sort of ethical system that had any sense of the right use of force or violence.

And by that, she meant they were reluctant to articulate any sense of applied ethics that held things like police, prisons or the law as a sanction. Her criticism was aimed especially at thinkers like Emmanuel Levinas, for whom ethics had become a matter of airy-fairy ideas like “the face” and “the other”; it was an ethics, she argued, that had come to be disengaged from the real world.

The point being is that the activist and demonstrator – and perhaps media commentator most of all – can all too easily allow themselves to enter into the fantasy of a free-floating ethical life, one whose distance from the practical demands of moral decision-making allows it to sustain the impression of its own innocence. And that is quite some charge.

https://unherd.com/2019/10/shouting-traitor-is-easier-than-actually-doing-any-good/?tl_inbound=1&tl_groups[0]=18743&tl_period_type=3

Key Document Level:

Key Document Level: Key Document:-Level2

Key Document Level: Supporting evidence

Pages

Subscribe to Values